ThirdLifeResearch › Screen Time Statistics Australia
ThirdLife Research

Screen time in Australia: the data behind a world-first experiment

Last updated 3 July 2026 · Compiled by the ThirdLife team from primary sources

Australia is running the world's most-watched experiment in children's digital regulation: since 10 December 2025, major platforms have been required to keep under-16s off social media accounts. Six months in, the compliance data is sobering, parents' concerns remain the highest-ranked child health issue in the country, and the gap between rules and reality has never been better documented. Here are the numbers.

Key takeaways

  • The social media minimum age took effect 10 December 2025, covering Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit, X and others, a world first.
  • Compliance is struggling: eSafety data from March 2026 showed about 7 in 10 underage children still held accounts, and a June 2026 BMJ study found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms.
  • In response, the government moved in June 2026 to double maximum penalties to $99 million and strengthen eSafety's information-gathering powers.
  • Before the rules, 84% of Australian kids aged 8–12 had already used social media or messaging apps (eSafety, 2024).
  • Excessive screen time is Australian parents' #1 child health concern, cited by more than 90% (Royal Children's Hospital National Child Health Poll).

The under-16 minimum age: what the law does

Under amendments to the Online Safety Act, 'age-restricted social media platforms' must take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from holding accounts. The obligation sits entirely on platforms, there are no penalties for children or parents, and as of 10 December 2025 it applies to Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit, Threads, X, Kick and Twitch, among others. Under-16s can still view public content without logging in, and messaging, gaming and education services are excluded. eSafety frames it as "a delay, not a ban": the target is the account-based design features, algorithmic feeds, notification streams, engagement mechanics, that the regulator links to harms to young people's health and wellbeing.

Six months in: the compliance picture

7 in 10

underage children still held social media accounts months after the rules began.

eSafety Commissioner data, March 2026
85%

of surveyed Australian 12–17-year-olds were using restricted platforms.

British Medical Journal, June 2026
$99m

the doubled maximum penalty announced in June 2026 for non-compliant platforms.

Australian Government, June 2026

The enforcement story is moving quickly. eSafety's March 2026 implementation update flagged five platforms for age-check compliance issues, and its data showed roughly seven in ten underage children on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok still held accounts. A British Medical Journal study published in late June 2026 found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms, with self-declared ages and selfie uploads, the weakest verification methods, the most common checks encountered. Within days, the Prime Minister announced legislation to double maximum penalties to $99 million and give eSafety the power to compel platforms (and third parties like age-assurance providers) to produce evidence of their compliance efforts.

Whatever the eventual outcome, one implication is already clear for families: regulation is not, in the near term, a substitute for visibility at home. The accounts largely still exist; they are simply less discussed.

What Australian kids' screen use actually looks like

MeasureFigureSource
Kids 8–12 who had used social media or messaging apps (pre-rules)84%eSafety Commissioner, 2024
Average daily screen time at home, Australian children (parent-reported)4.5+ hoursRCH National Child Health Poll
Children exceeding national screen time recommendationsMajority, across all age groupsRCH National Child Health Poll
Australian children under 2 with regular screen time (vs guidance of none)63%RCH National Child Health Poll
Educators reporting declining student focus78%Gonski Institute, Growing Up Digital Australia
Teachers who say digital tech is a growing distraction84%Gonski Institute

Parents' concerns, and the official guidance

The Royal Children's Hospital National Child Health Poll, a national survey of Australian households, has repeatedly found excessive screen time to be the number one health concern parents hold for children, cited as a problem by more than 90% of parents, ahead of cyberbullying (second) and internet safety (third). Australia's official 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommend no screen time before age 2, no more than an hour a day for ages 2–5, and no more than 2 hours of recreational screen time for ages 5–17, thresholds the RCH polling shows most Australian children exceed.

Australian adults are no exception to the global picture, averaging around six hours a day online per DataReportal's country data, meaning the family screen time conversation is rarely only about the kids.

For Australian parents navigating the new rules: eSafety maintains official guidance for families at esafety.gov.au, including which platforms are restricted, how age checks work, and conversation resources for talking with under-16s about the change.

The rules changed. The need to understand didn't.

ThirdLife is built in Australia for families navigating exactly this moment: a pattern-level view of your child's digital life, themes, safety signals, sleep and AI use, without reading their messages. The beta is live, join the queue for the next wave.

Keep me posted

Frequently asked questions

Is social media banned for under-16s in Australia?

Since 10 December 2025, platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit and X must take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from holding accounts. eSafety describes it as a delay rather than a ban, under-16s face no penalties, can still view public content, and messaging, gaming and education services are excluded.

Is Australia's under-16 social media law working?

Compliance is contested. eSafety data from March 2026 showed about 7 in 10 underage children still held accounts, and a June 2026 BMJ study found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms. In June 2026 the government announced doubled penalties (to $99 million) and stronger enforcement powers in response.

What are the penalties for platforms that don't comply?

Civil penalties of up to $49.5 million, with legislation announced in June 2026 to double the maximum to $99 million and expand eSafety's information-gathering powers.

What are Australia's official screen time guidelines?

The 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommend no screen time before age 2, no more than 1 hour daily for ages 2–5, and no more than 2 hours of recreational screen time for ages 5–17. RCH polling shows the majority of Australian children exceed these at every age.

Sources

  1. eSafety Commissioner, Social media age restrictions and implementation updates
  2. Australian Government, Social Media Minimum Age
  3. NPR, Australia plans to strengthen under-16 social media laws (June 2026, covering the BMJ study and eSafety data)
  4. Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, National Child Health Poll
  5. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Screen time effects and guidelines
  6. Gonski Institute for Education, Growing Up Digital Australia
  7. DataReportal, Digital reports, Australia country data